|
|
Reducing Antihypertensive Medication Use in Nursing Home Patients
Jack Froom, MD;
Jeffrey Trilling, MD
Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:378-383.
ABSTRACT
Of the 1.5 million nursing home residents, about 40% are aged 85 years or older, and a similar percentage have hypertension. The rates of incorrect diagnoses from the "white coat" effect and from errors in blood pressure evaluation are as frequent in older persons as in younger persons. The benefits of antihypertensive treatment and the risks of lowering blood pressures in the very old (85 years) are uncertain. Elderly patients experience adverse effects from drug treatment that are unique to their age group and that complicate management problems associated with polypharmacy and multiple comorbid conditions. Trials to withdraw or lower the dosage of antihypertensive medications have been successful in up to 40% of elderly persons when combined with salt restriction and weight loss, but such studies are lacking in nursing home patients. The management of hypertension should be reevaluated in nursing home patients.
INTRODUCTION
Pharmacological therapy reduces risks for complications of hypertension (stroke, congestive heart failure, renal failure, and mortality) in young1-7 and elderly8-13 patients. Although there is strong evidence of benefit from drug treatment for most patients, several areas of uncertainty remain. Among these are rates of diagnostic accuracy, risks, and benefits of therapy in the very old (85 years) and in those either with multiple comorbid conditions or living in long-term institutional settings such as nursing homes. Although much of the content of this review pertains to all elderly patients, we focus on those residing in nursing homes. These patients have many comorbid conditions for which they take multiple medications. They are at increased risk for adverse drug reactions, and changes resulting from management modifications can be observed and continuously monitored.
HYPERTENSION IN NURSING HOME PATIENTS
Forty percent of the approximately 1.5 million nursing homes residents are aged 85 years or older,14 and between 32% and 44% have hypertension.15-17 To our knowledge, there have been few hypertension studies in nursing home patients. The prevalence of hypertension reported as only 14.0% in the 1985 National Nursing Home Survey18 is considerably lower than the rate of 54.9% for noninstitutionalized persons aged 65 to 74 years19 and the rates of 34.0% (men) and 50.0% (women) for those aged 85 years and older.20 Using a database of almost 300 000 nursing home patients in 5 US states, Gambassi et al17 report hypertension in 32%, with the highest prevalence among African Americans and women. Seventy percent receive antihypertensive medications. This percentage decreases with increasing age (85 years: odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.89). Recorded blood pressure readings were unavailable in this study, and the extent of blood pressure control is unknown. Data from 2 cross-sectional studies are similar. In a survey of 617 patients in 17 Texas nursing homes,15 and in one16 of 804 patients in 3 New York nursing homes, rates of hypertension were reported as 40% and 44%, respectively. Studies that use higher blood pressures to define hypertension (systolic blood pressure, 160 mm Hg) report rates that vary from 15% to 44%.21-22
Multiple comorbid conditions are the rule, and complicate therapy for hypertension. Gambassi et al17 report that 67% of patients had 3 or more and 25% had 6 or more; Trilling et al16 report an average of 5 per patient. The most common long-term problems are ischemic heart disease, 32% to 39%; cerebrovascular disease, 26% to 30%; anemia, 20%; depression, 17% to 20%; arthritis, 15% to 36%; and diabetes, 15% to 27%.15-16 Rates of dementia range from 36% to 43%.16, 23
Polypharmacy also complicates therapy in hypertensive nursing home patients. Avorn and Gurwitz24 report an average of 7.2 prescribed medications daily; Beers et al,25 8.1; and Trilling et al,16 8.7. In the latter report, the number of daily medications is 9.4 for patients with hypertension and 8.0 for those who are normotensive. The distribution of antihypertensive medications is as follows: calcium channel blockers, 26% to 30%; diuretics, 25% to 28%; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, 22% to 27%; -blockers, 8%; and -blockers, 5.3%.16-17 These data on calcium channel blockers are similar to those reported by others26-27 and mirror the distribution in the general geriatric population, in whom they are the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications.28-29
The number of hypertensive nursing home patients who do not receive antihypertensive medications varies from 24% to 30%.16-17 Blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) is excellent, achieved in 88.8% of patients taking medication.16 Perhaps the amount of time spent in bed contributes to the high rate of successful blood pressure control. Of those treated, 54.0% to 58.7% receive 1 and 32.7% receive 2 drugs.16-17
ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSIS
Incorrect technique for blood pressure measurement might result in incorrect diagnoses. Using a trained physician as the reference standard, Stoneking et al30 found that nursing home staff significantly underestimated systolic blood pressure and overestimated diastolic blood pressure, resulting in the misclassification of hypertension in 21% of patients. An additional source of error is falsely elevated blood pressure readings from "white coat hypertension." In a study of 50 untreated patients with hypertension aged 70 years and older (mean ± SD, 79 ± 6 years), 9 (18%) were classified as having white coat hypertension and an additional 13 (26%) as having an intermediate hypertension between normal and abnormal.31 Findings in younger persons are similar32-33 and, together with other studies,34-35 suggest that some patients with hypertension might be normotensive. Although it is likely that the hypertension was present for most nursing home residents before admission, studies15-17 of hypertension in nursing home patients do not report rates of new diagnoses following admission. The extrapolation of findings in an ambulatory setting to nursing homes is questionable, because blood pressure measurements taken at the bedside might not be subject to the white coat effect. The issue is germane because some investigators36-37 suggest that white coat hypertension might not be benign and could cause cardiovascular abnormalities that include stiffness, loss of compliance, and elasticity of cardiac muscle. Although there is little evidence from longitudinal studies38 that this group of patients is at increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity or mortality, the prognosis is uncertain and continued monitoring is indicated.
If the diagnosis of hypertension is in doubt, ambulatory blood pressure measurements (automated multiple blood pressure readings during a 24-hour period), although expensive, could help resolve the problem. Correlation between office and ambulatory blood pressure readings is poor even when measurements from as many as 6 office visits are averaged.39 Ambulatory blood pressure readings predict cardiac size and function better than office blood pressure determinations.40 Adjustment of antihypertensive medication using ambulatory blood pressure readings results in less intensive treatment, while maintaining good control of blood pressure and improved well-being, when compared with adjustments based on office measurements.41
CARDIOVASCULAR RISKS FROM HYPERTENSION IN THE VERY OLD
The cardiovascular risks in the very old (85 years) from uncontrolled hypertension are uncertain.42 Bulpitt and Fletcher43 report a negative relation between hypertension and mortality in men older than 75 years and in women older than 85 years, with hypertensive persons living longer. In a study of 795 community-dwelling men and women aged 75 years and older, a decrease of 5 mm Hg or greater in diastolic blood pressure in men was associated with an increased all-cause mortality (relative risk, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.39-3.91) and cardiovascular mortality (relative risk, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.47-6.66). Men taking antihypertensive medication whose diastolic blood pressure decreased had a higher risk of mortality (relative risk, 12.33; 95% CI, 2.73-55.72) when compared with treated men whose diastolic blood pressure did not decrease.44 Using data from the Framingham study, D'Agostino et al45 found that, independent of antihypertensive treatment, low diastolic blood pressures were associated with increased cardiovascular deaths in persons with a history of myocardial infarction, but increased systolic blood pressures caused a small but statistically significant increase in cardiovascular disease. Other investigators interpret these relations differently. The National Institute on Aging-Sponsored Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies in the Elderly46 concludes that excess mortality in elderly persons with a lower blood pressure might in part be due to comorbid conditions and suggests that there is no consistent relation between diastolic pressure and mortality. In a community study of 835 people older than 85 years, Boshuizen et al47 conclude that the relation between low blood pressure and increased mortality is caused by poor health and not by the blood pressure levels.
None of the randomized treatment trials of elderly patients8-13 enrolled enough patients aged 85 years and older to provide a definitive answer about the value of drug therapy in this age group. The study9 by the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly found that treatment conferred little or no benefit for persons older than 80 years. Subsequent subgroup analyses of data from that study for the group aged 80 years and older showed no treatment benefit for total and cardiovascular mortality but suggest that treatment "probably still prevented cardiovascular complications, stroke and cardiac end points."48(p1686) Subgroup analyses of the treated group aged 80 years and older compared with the placebo group in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program showed a reduction in episodes of congestive heart failure and strokes.49-50
Data from observational studies and clinical trials fail to define the benefits and risks of treating hypertension in the very old. Definitive answers could be forthcoming from the ongoing Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial.51 This is an open study, however, and it is unlikely that nursing home patients are included; patients confined to bed and those with dementia are excluded.
RISKS OF PHARMACOLOGICAL THERAPY
In addition to commonly experienced adverse effects from antihypertensive medications, elderly persons are subject to risks that differ from those in younger persons. In a stratified random sample of 1358 persons aged 65 years and older, Cumming et al52 report increased risk of falls (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8) in persons taking diuretics. Other investigators53-54 also report an association between diuretics and falls in elderly persons, although some55-57 report no association. Possible mechanisms for the presumed relation are hypokalemia-induced cardiac dysrhythmias and orthostatic hypotension. The risk of falls from use of diuretics, if true, is to some extent mitigated by the reduced risk of hip fracture, presumably due to increased bone density.58
Other adverse effects of antihypertensive medications have been reported in older persons. In a study of 1430 adults aged 45 to 89 years, drug therapy was associated with meaningful decreases in reported health status.59 Heckbert et al60 note that hypertensive patients taking calcium channel blockers or loop diuretics had more abnormalities on their magnetic resonance imaging scans and lower scores on modified Mini-Mental State Examinations than users of -blockers or benzothiadiazides. Using multiple logistic regression analyses, Guo et al61 report a relation between cognitive impairment, slower pulse rates, limitations of activities of daily living, and heart failure combined with low systolic blood pressures (<130 mm Hg) among 1389 persons with an average age of 85 years. Cognitive impairment was also related to low diastolic pressures (<70 mm Hg), as were limitations of activities of daily living, slow heart rate, increasing age, and arrhythmias. Use of antihypertensive agents in these patients was not assessed. Skoog et al,62 however, report that blood pressure declines years before the onset of dementia, similar to or lower than in persons without dementia. Although Guo et al63 reported an association of low blood pressure with Alzheimer disease, a report from the Systolic Hypertension in Europetrial64 that compared placebo (n=1180) with calcium channel blockers (n=1238) found that the incidence of dementia was reduced from 7.7 to 3.8 cases per 100 patient-years (21 vs 11 patients; P=.05). The relation between antihypertensive therapy and cognitive impairment, therefore, is uncertain.
Withdrawal of antihypertensive agents can correct medication-induced abnormalities and adverse effects. The normalization of electrolytes and carbohydrate and lipid metabolism after withdrawal of antihypertensive medications and the disappearance of erectile dysfunction, impaired glucose tolerance, dizziness, Raynaud phenomenon, dyspnea, and gout have been reported.65-66 In summary, the potential benefits of antihypertensive pharmacological therapy in elderly persons must be assessed against adverse consequences. After analyses of data from 300 000 nursing home patients, Gambassi et al17(p2383) conclude the following about the use of antihypertensive agents, "it is completely unknown whether the risks of therapy may outweigh the benefits among severely impaired patients."
TRIALS TO REDUCE DOSAGE OR WITHDRAW ANTIHYPERTENSIVE MEDICATIONS
There are several compelling reasons to consider reduction of dosage or discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs in the very old. Older patients are more sensitive to volume depletion and sympathetic inhibition than are younger individuals. Since comorbid conditions and concurrent medications also are more frequent in older persons, risks of adverse drug interactions and adverse effects are increased.
To our knowledge, there are few reports of trials to step down dosage or withdraw antihypertensive medications in elderly patients and none in nursing home residents. Hansen et al67 note that of 105 elderly hypertensive patients in whom medications were withdrawn, blood pressures increased to unacceptable levels soon after withdrawal in 51 (48.6%), but 43 (41.0%) remained normotensive for 11 months. In addition, drug treatment was simplified for patients in whom medication therapy was restarted. Before withdrawal, 14 patients were taking 2 or more medications compared with 2 after restarting medication therapy.
Lernfelt et al68 observed 25 hypertensive patients aged 70 years and older, without evidence of cardiovascular disease, for 2 years after withdrawal of medication. Although blood pressures increased in 14 patients who completed the study, there were no changes in left ventricular morphologic features or diastolic function. In this group, however, there was a statistically significant decrease in left ventricular fractional shortening but no signs of congestive heart failure. In a group of primary care patients, Straand et al69 report successful withdrawal of diuretic therapy in 18 (55%) of 33 patients followed up for 6 months.
In a study of 333 elderly hypertensive patients aged 74 years and older, withdrawal of treatment was successful during the first year in 40% and for the full 5 years in 20%. During the period of no treatment, the patients had a lower total mortality risk than that of the general Swedish population matched for age and sex and a lower risk of cardiovascular events than those who continued to be treated.70 Nadal et al71 report successful discontinuation of antihypertensive medication in 14 (16%) of 86 elderly patients during a 3-year period. Fotherby and Potter72 were able to discontinue antihypertensive medication for 12 months in 25% of ambulatory patients aged 65 to 84 years and for 24 months in 20%. Predictors of successful discontinuation of medication were lower body mass index, lower electrocardiographic voltage (rV1 and sV6), and lower systolic blood pressures while undergoing treatment.
Nutritional therapy can augment the effect of medication,73 and a diet has been suggested when attempting to modify antihypertensive medication dosage. In the Trial of Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Elderly,74-75 43.6% of patients aged 60 to 80 years assigned to sodium reduction and weight loss, 37.8% assigned to sodium reduction only, 39.2% assigned to weight loss only, and 16.3% assigned to usual care remained normotensive and without an adverse cardiovascular event for 30 months after the withdrawal of antihypertensive medications.
Meta-analysis for the studies cited is inappropriate because of marked differences in the characteristics of the populations (baseline demographic and illness characteristics) and in study design (method of medication withdrawal, criteria for restarting medication therapy, and length of follow-up76). Since all of these trials were in ambulatory populations, the findings might not apply to institutionalized patients.
HAZARDS OF DRUG WITHDRAWAL
None of the studies previously quoted report adverse consequences from withdrawing antihypertensive medications in patients who remained normotensive. Withdrawal of diuretics might result in recurrence of peripheral edema that some patients find uncomfortable, and others may object to discontinuing a medication they had taken for several years. Since many patients whose blood pressures were normalized following withdrawal of medications later reverted to hypertensive levels, long-term or lifetime follow-up is required.
GUIDELINES FOR WITHDRAWAL OF MEDICATION
Dannenberg and Kannel77 suggest the need to develop guidelines for physicians who want to attempt withdrawal of medication in hypertensive patients. They propose that for patients receiving multiple blood pressure medications, after normotension for 6 to 12 months, all but one be gradually withdrawn. Patients taking a single medication and normotensive for 6 to 12 months should have that medication withdrawn if pretreatment blood pressures were only mildly elevated or if significant improvement in risk factor reduction (decreases in body weight and sodium consumption and increases in exercise) has occurred since starting to take the medication. Patients in whom medication has been withdrawn should be monitored every 3 to 6 months for life and encouraged to reduce risks from overweight, excess sodium ingestion, and lack of exercise. We further suggest that these guidelines be tested in controlled clinical trials and be reviewed by the Joint National Committee. In their sixth and most recent report,78 the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure recommends that step-down therapy of antihypertensive dosages be considered after the blood pressure has been controlled for at least 1 year and that careful follow-up be performed in patients in whom antihypertensive medications have been withdrawn. Tested guidelines for step-down therapy and withdrawal are not included in this or prior reports.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The diagnosis of hypertension might be incorrect in as many as 25% of patients because of the white coat effect and inaccurate or insufficient number of blood pressure assessments. The risks and benefits of treating hypertension in the very old are uncertain and, in addition to the risks of adverse effects from pharmacological agents experienced by younger patients, this population might face additional risks such as falls and mental disorders. Multiple comorbid conditions and polypharmacy characteristic of nursing home patients increase these risks and complicate therapy. Studies of healthy ambulatory populations should not be extrapolated to those who are infirm. Lack of evidence of benefit from randomized trials in the very old, however, does not prove that pharmacological therapy is not needed.
The nursing home population is an ideal group to consider step-down dosage and attempted withdrawal of hypertensive medications because patients' blood pressures can be monitored frequently and antihypertensive medication therapy can be restarted if blood pressures increase to unacceptable levels. Although studies that attempt to reduce or remove antihypertensive medications in nursing home patients have not been reported, to our knowledge, after examining 58 nursing home patients with hypertension, Lapierre et al79 suggest that 43% of patients receiving therapy could have their medications discontinued or reduced. The absence of pharmacological therapy in 24% to 30% of patients with hypertension16-17 might indicate that physicians caring for these patients consider such therapy unnecessary. In contrast to ambulatory patients, the high degree of blood pressure control (88%) in nursing home patients with hypertension16 suggests that lower dosage and even withdrawal of antihypertensive medications could be successful in significant numbers, especially if combined with dietary changes.
We recommend that all nursing home patients taking antihypertensive medications be reevaluated. Not all patients are suitable for therapy modification, and clinical judgment for individual patients is required. For example, patients taking antihypertensive medications for indications other than hypertension, such as -blockers for angina or to prevent recurrent myocardial infarction, and those taking diuretics for congestive heart failure should not be included. Recent bouts of myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure are additional reasons for exclusion. Within the constraints imposed by comorbid conditions, diet should be optimized to reduce sodium intake and to achieve ideal weight.
In the absence of tested guidelines for reduction of dosage and subsequent withdrawal of medications, a conservative approach is suggested. Attempts should be made in patients taking single antihypertensive medications, whose blood pressures have been controlled during the preceding 12 months. For patients taking more than 1 antihypertensive medication, attempts should be made to achieve control with a single medication. Although calcium channel blockers are the most frequently used antihypertensive agents in nursing home patients,16-17 diuretics are generally preferred for systolic hypertension in elderly patients.79 Yet, recent data demonstrating decreased incidence of dementia in patients treated with calcium channel blockers64 need to be considered when deciding on which antihypertensive medication is most appropriate.
Dosage adjustments should be made slowly (particularly for patients taking -blockers) and blood pressures monitored frequently, perhaps weekly until drug withdrawal is complete. Subsequently, blood pressures should be measured monthly (routine for most skilled nursing facilities) during the remainder of the patients' stay in the institution. For those who leave, continued monitoring is desirable because blood pressures might increase again later.
These changes can be accomplished with few additional resources, and savings in costs of medications will probably offset costs of increased frequency of monitoring. Patients will most likely benefit with decreases in adverse effects and improved functional status, without incurring risks.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Accepted for publication December 10, 1999.
Reprints: Jack Froom, MD, Department of Family Medicine, Health Sciences Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8461 (e-mail: froom{at}fammed.som.sunysb.edu).
From the Department of Family Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
REFERENCES
| |
1. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension, I: results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg. JAMA. 1967;202:1028-1034.
FREE FULL TEXT
2. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension, II: results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg. JAMA. 1970;213:1143-1152.
FREE FULL TEXT
3. United States Public Health Service Hospitals Cooperative Study Group. Treatment of mild hypertension: results of a ten-year intervention trial. Circ Res. 1977;40(suppl):I98-I105.
4. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. Five-year findings of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program, I: reduction in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension. JAMA. 1979;242:2562-2571.
FREE FULL TEXT
5. Helgeland A. Treatment of mild hypertension: a five-year controlled drug trial: the Oslo study. Am J Med. 1980;69:725-732.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
6. Australian National Blood Pressure Study Management Committee. The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Lancet. 1980;1:1261-1267.
PUBMED
7. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. The effect of treatment on mortality in "mild" hypertension: results of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:976-980.
ABSTRACT
8. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. JAMA. 1991;265:3255-3264.
FREE FULL TEXT
9. Amery A, Birkenhager W, Brixko P, et al. Mortality and morbidity results from the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly trial. Lancet. 1985;1:1349-1354.
ISI
| PUBMED
10. Stamler J. Risk factor modification trials: implications for the elderly. Eur Heart J. 1988;9(suppl D):9-53.
11. Coope J, Warrender TS. Randomized trial of treatment of hypertension in elderly patients in primary care. BMJ. 1986;293:1145-1151.
12. Dahlof B, Lindholm LH, Hansson L, Schersten B, Ekbom T, Wester PO. Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients With Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension). Lancet. 1991;338:1281-1285.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
13. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Lancet. 1997;350:757-764.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
14. Sirrocco A. Nursing Homes and Board and Care Homes. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1994. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 244.
15. Mulrow CD, Chiodo LK, Gerety MB, Lee S, Basu S, Nelson D. Function and medical comorbidity in south Texas nursing home residents: variations by ethnic groups. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:279-284.
ISI
| PUBMED
16. Trilling JS, Froom J, Gomolin IH, Yeh S, Grimson RC, Nevin S. Hypertension in nursing home patients. J Hum Hypertens. 1998;12:117-121.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
17. Gambassi G, Lapane K, Sgadari A, et al. Prevalence, clinical correlates, and treatment of hypertension in elderly nursing home residents. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2377-2385.
FREE FULL TEXT
18. Hing E, Sekscenski E, Strahan G. The National Nursing Home Survey: 1985 Summary for the United States: Vital and Health Statistics. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1989. DHHS publication (PHS) 89-1758.
19. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group report on hypertension in the elderly. Hypertension. 1994;23:275-285.
FREE FULL TEXT
20. Bild DE, Fitzpatrick A, Fried LP, et al. Age-related trends in cardiovascular morbidity and physical functioning in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41:1047-1056.
ISI
| PUBMED
21. Aronow WS, Ahn C. Risk factors for new coronary events in a large cohort of very elderly patients with and without coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:864-866.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
22. Auseon A, Ooi WI, Hossain M, Lipsitz LA. Blood pressure behavior in the nursing home: implications for diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:283-290.
23. Lair T, Lefkowitz D. Mental health and functional status of residents of nursing and personal care homes. In: National Medical Expenditure Survey Research Findings. Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service; 1990. DHHS publication (PHS) 90-3470.
24. Avorn J, Gurwitz JH. Drug use in the nursing home. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:195-204.
FREE FULL TEXT
25. Beers MH, Ouslander JG, Fingold SF, et al. Inappropriate medication prescribing in skilled-nursing facilities. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:684-689.
26. Espeland MA, Kumanyika S, Kostis JB, et al. Antihypertensive medication use among recruits for the Trial of Nonpharmacological Interventions in the Elderly (TONE). J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:1183-1189.
ISI
| PUBMED
27. Siegel D, Lopez J. Trends in antihypertensive drug use in the United States: do the JNC V recommendations affect prescribing? JAMA. 1997;278:1745-1748.
FREE FULL TEXT
28. Fishkind D, Paris BEC, Aronow WS. Use of digoxin, diuretics, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers in older patients in an academic hospital-based geriatrics practice. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:809-812.
ISI
| PUBMED
29. Glynn RJ, Brock DB, Harris T, et al. Use of antihypertensive drugs and trends in blood pressure in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1855-1860.
FREE FULL TEXT
30. Stoneking HT, Hla KM, Samsa GP, Feussner JR. Blood pressure measurements in the nursing home: are they accurate? Gerontologist. 1992;32:536-540.
ABSTRACT
31. Trenkwalder P, Plaschke M, Steffes-Tremer I, Lydtin H. "White coat" hypertension and alerting reaction in elderly and very elderly hypertensive patients. Blood Press. 1993;2:262-271.
PUBMED
32. Pickering TG, James GD, Boddie C, Harshfield GA, Blank S, Laragh JH. How common is white coat hypertension? JAMA. 1988;259:225-228.
FREE FULL TEXT
33. Hoegholm A, Kristensen KS, Madsen NH, Svendsen TL. White coat hypertension diagnosed by 24-h ambulatory monitoring: examination of 159 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:64-70.
ISI
| PUBMED
34. Colandrea MA, Friedman GD, Nichaman MZ, Lynd CN. Systolic hypertension in the elderly: an epidemiologic assessment. Circulation. 1970;41:239-245.
FREE FULL TEXT
35. Mejia AD, Egan BM, Schork NJ, Zweifler AJ. Artifacts in measurement of blood pressure and lack of target organ involvement in the assessment of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:270-277.
36. Glen SK, Elliot HL, Curzio JL, Lees KR, Reid JL. White-coat hypertension as a cause of cardiovascular dysfunction. Lancet. 1996;348:654-657.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
37. McGrath BP. Is white-coat hypertension innocent [comment]? Lancet. 1996;348:630.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
38. Gosse P, Bougaleb M, Egloff P, Lemetayer P, Clementy J. Clinical significance of white-coat hypertension. J Hypertens. 1994;12(suppl 8):S43-S47.
39. Pearce KA, Evans GW, Summerson J, Rao JS. Comparisons of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and repeated office measurements in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:426-433.
ISI
| PUBMED
40. White WB, Schulman P, McCabe EJ, Dey HM. Average daily blood pressure, not office blood pressure, determines cardiac function in patients with hypertension. JAMA. 1989;261:873-877.
FREE FULL TEXT
41. Staessen JA, Byttebier G, Buntinx F, Cells H, O'Brien ET, Fagard R for the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Treatment of Hypertension Investigators. Antihypertensive treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure measurement: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278:1065-1072.
FREE FULL TEXT
42. Fletcher A, Bulpitt C. Epidemiology of hypertension in the elderly. J Hypertens. 1994;12(suppl 6):S3-S5.
43. Bulpitt CJ, Fletcher AE. Prognostic significance of blood pressure in the very old: implications for treatment decision. Drugs Aging. 1994;5:184-191.
ISI
| PUBMED
44. Langer RD, Criqui MH, Barrett-Conner EL, Klauber MR, Ganiats TG. Blood pressure change and survival after age 75. Hypertension. 1993;22:551-559.
FREE FULL TEXT
45. D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB, Cruickshank JM. Relation of low diastolic blood pressure to coronary heart disease death in presence of myocardial infarction: the Framingham Study. BMJ. 1991;303:385-389.
46. Taylor JO, Cornoni-Huntley J, Curb JD, et al. Blood pressure and mortality risk in the elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:489-501.
FREE FULL TEXT
47. Boshuizen HC, Izaks GJ, van Buuren S, Ligthart GJ. Blood pressure and mortality in elderly people aged 85 and older: community based study. BMJ. 1998;316:1780-1784.
FREE FULL TEXT
48. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Subgroup and per-protocol analysis of the Randomized European Trial on Isolated Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1681-1691.
FREE FULL TEXT
49. Kostis JB, Davis BR, Cutler J, et al. Prevention of heart failure by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. JAMA. 1997;278:212-216.
FREE FULL TEXT
50. The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group. Implications of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. Hypertension. 1993;21:335-343.
FREE FULL TEXT
51. Bulpitt CJ, Fletcher AE, Amery A, et al. The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET): rationale, methodology and comparison with previous trials. Drugs Aging. 1994;5:171-183.
ISI
| PUBMED
52. Cumming RG, Miller JP, Kelsey JL, et al. Medications and multiple falls in elderly people: the St Louis OASIS study. Age Ageing. 1991;20:455-461.
FREE FULL TEXT
53. Prudham D, Evans JG. Factors associated with falls in the elderly: a community study. Age Ageing. 1981;10:141-146.
54. Sobel KG, McCart GM. Drug use and accidental falls in an intermediate care facility. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1983;17:539-542.
ABSTRACT
55. Blake AJ, Morgan K, Bendall MJ, et al. Falls by elderly people at home: prevalence and associated factors. Age Ageing. 1988;17:365-372.
FREE FULL TEXT
56. Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Kidd S, Black D. Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls: a prospective study. JAMA. 1989;261:2663-2668.
FREE FULL TEXT
57. Granek E, Baker SP, Abbey H, et al. Medications and diagnoses in relation to falls in a long-term care facility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987;35:503-511.
ISI
| PUBMED
58. LaCroix AZ, Wienpahl J, White LR, et al. Thiazide diuretic agents and the incidence of hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:286-290.
ABSTRACT
59. Lawrence WF, Fryback DG, Martin PA, Klein R, Klein BEK. Health status and hypertension: a population-based study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1239-1245.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
60. Heckbert SR, Longstreth WT, Psalty BM, et al. The association of antihypertensive agents with MRI white matter findings and with modified Mini-Mental State Examination in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1423-1433.
ISI
| PUBMED
61. Guo Z, Viitanen M, Winblad B. Clinical correlates of low blood pressure in very old people: the importance of cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:701-705.
ISI
| PUBMED
62. Skoog I, Lernfelt B, Landahl S, et al. 15-Year longitudinal study of blood pressure and dementia. Lancet. 1996;347:1141-1145.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
63. Guo Z, Viitanen M, Fratiglioni L, Winblad B. Low blood pressure and dementia in elderly people: the Kungsholmen project. BMJ. 1996;312:805-808.
FREE FULL TEXT
64. Forette F, Seux ML, Staessen JA, et al. Prevention of dementia in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial. Lancet. 1998;352:1347-1351.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
65. Report of Medical Research Council Working Party on Mild to Moderate Hypertension: adverse reactions to bendrofluazide and propranolol for the treatment of mild hypertension. Lancet. 1981;2:539-543.
PUBMED
66. Middeke M, Richter WO, Schwandt P, Beck B, Holzgreve H. Normalization of lipid metabolism after withdrawal from antihypertensive long-term therapy with beta blockers and diuretics. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:145-147.
FREE FULL TEXT
67. Hansen AG, Jensen H, Laugesen LP, Petersen A. Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in the elderly. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1983;676:I78-I85.
68. Lernfelt B, Landahl S, Svanborg A, Wikstrand J. Overtreatment of hypertension in the elderly? J Hypertens. 1990;8:483-490.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
69. Straand J, Fugelli P, Laake AK. Withdrawing long-term diuretic treatment among elderly patients in general practice. Fam Pract. 1993;10:38-42.
FREE FULL TEXT
70. Ekbom T, Lindholm LH, Oden A, et al. A 5-year prospective observational study of the withdrawal of antihypertensive treatment in elderly people. J Intern Med. 1994;235:581-588.
ISI
| PUBMED
71. Nadal M, Wikstrom L, Allgulander S. Once hypertensive, always hypertensive? a three year follow-up after stopping medication. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994;12:62-64.
PUBMED
72. Fotherby MD, Potter JF. Possibilities for antihypertensive drug therapy withdrawal in the elderly. J Hum Hypertens. 1994;8:857-863.
ISI
| PUBMED
73. The Treatment of Mild Hypertension Research Group. The treatment of mild hypertension study: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a nutritional-hygienic regimen along with various drug monotherapies. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1413-1423.
FREE FULL TEXT
74. Whelton PK, Appel LJ, Espeland MA, et al. Sodium reduction and weight loss in the treatment of hypertension in older persons: a randomized controlled Trial of Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Elderly (TONE). JAMA. 1998;279:839-846.
FREE FULL TEXT
75. Kostis JB, Espeland MA, Appel L, Johnson KC, Pierce J, Wofford JL for the Trial of Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Elderly (TONE) Cooperative Research Group. Does withdrawal of antihypertensive medication increase the risk of cardiovascular events? Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1501-1508.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
76. Moher D. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: a concern for standards. JAMA. 1995;274:1962-1964.
FREE FULL TEXT
77. Dannenberg AL, Kannel WB. Remission of hypertension: the "natural" history of blood pressure treatment in the Framingham study. JAMA. 1987;257:1477-1483.
FREE FULL TEXT
78. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:2413-2445.
FREE FULL TEXT
79. Lapierre G, Pevonca P, Stewart RB, Yost RL. Evaluation of hypertensive therapy in a skilled nursing facility. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1983;17:39-44.
ABSTRACT
RELATED ARTICLE
The Archives of Family Medicine Continuing Medical Education Program
Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(4):375-377.
FULL TEXT
|