JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 9 No. 4, April 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal

Enhancing Influenza Immunization

Postcard and Telephone Reminders and the Challenge of Immunization Site Shift

Rick D. Kellerman, MD; Charles T. Allred, MD; Larry E. Frisch, MD, MPH

Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:368-372.

Objective  To determine if postcard and telephone reminders increased the rate of influenza immunization of Medicare beneficiaries.

Design  Before and after trial (postcard reminders) with systematically allocated control group (telephone reminder intervention).

Setting  A semirural family practice residency program.

Patients and Other Participants  All 475 noninstitutionalized persons older than 65 years who had received at least 1 office service in the previous 2 years.

Intervention  In September 1996, each of 475 patients received a postcard urging prompt influenza immunization. Those not responding within 1 month were systematically allocated either to a group receiving further telephone contact or to a control group. At the time of telephone contact, any offered information about influenza immunization received outside the Smoky Hill Family Practice Center, Salina, Kan, was recorded.

Main Outcome Measures  We measured the percentage of change in practice-administered influenza immunizations compared with the baseline rate of the preceding 2 years; the difference in immunization rates between the telephone intervention group and controls; and the number of patients contacted by telephone who reported receiving influenza immunization at a site other than the Family Practice Center.

Results  Twenty-eight percent of patients who received a postcard obtained office influenza immunizations within 1 month, but no additional immunizations could be attributed to the telephone intervention. Thirty-five percent of patients contacted by telephone reported receiving influenza immunization at a site other than the Family Practice Center.

Conclusions  The postcard intervention was associated with a significant increase in the office immunization rate. This increase may have been confounded by "site shift" in which individuals came to the office for an immunization that they might otherwise have received at other community sites.


From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita (Drs Kellerman and Frisch), and the Smoky Hill Family Practice Center, Salina, Kan (Dr Allred).


RELATED ARTICLE

The Archives of Family Medicine Continuing Medical Education Program
Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(4):375-377.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Distribution of Influenza Vaccine to High-Risk Groups
Ompad et al.
Epidemiol Rev 2006;28:54-70.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interactive Voice Response Reminder Effects on Preventive Service Utilization
Crawford et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2005;20:329-336.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.