Indian Journal of Human Genetics
Home Current Issue Archives Guidelines Subscriptions e-Alerts Login 
Users online: 36
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 27-31

Power comparison between population-based case-control studies and family-based transmission-disequilibrium tests: An empirical study


Human Genetics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Correspondence Address:
Saurabh Ghosh
Human Genetics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata 203, B.T. Road, Kolkata - 700 108
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, USA, grant R01 TW 006604-05 to Saurabh Ghosh and by the fellowship 09/093(0111)/2008-EMR-I to Tanushree Haldar from the Council of Scientifi c and Industrial Research (CSIR), Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-6866.80355

Get Permissions

Background: There are two major classes of genetic association analyses: population based and family based. Population-based case-control studies have been the method of choice due to the ease of data collection. However, population stratification is one of the major limitations of case-control studies, while family-based studies are protected against stratification. In this study, we carry out extensive simulations under different disease models (both Mendelian as well as complex) to evaluate the relative powers of the two approaches in detecting association. Materials and Methods: The power comparisons are based on a case-control design comprising 200 cases and 200 controls versus a Transmission Disequilibrium Test (TDT) or Pedigree Disequilibrium Test (PDT) design with 200 informative trios. We perform the allele-level test for case-control studies, which is based on the difference of allele frequencies at a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) between unrelated cases and controls. The TDT and the PDT are based on preferential allelic transmissions at a SNP from heterozygous parents to the affected offspring. We considered five disease modes of inheritance: (i) recessive with complete penetrance (ii) dominant with complete penetrance and (iii), (iv) and (v) complex diseases with varying levels of penetrances and phenocopies. Results: We find that while the TDT/PDT design with 200 informative trios is in general more powerful than a case-control design with 200 cases and 200 controls (except when the heterozygosity at the marker locus is high), it may be necessary to sample a very large number of trios to obtain the requisite number of informative families. Conclusion: The current study provides insights into power comparisons between population-based and family-based association studies.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1476    
    Printed98    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded65    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal