Online Life Writing: One Israeli's Search For Sanity

Michael Keren (University of Calgary, Canada, mkeren at

DOI: 10.1191/0967550705ab026oa


This article introduces the burgeoning new medium of `blogs' — online diaries with links to websites of presumed interest. It argues that online diarists step into the traditional role attributed to intellectuals of providing society with meaning and guidance. Focusing on present day Israel, it shows how the failure of Israel's intellectuals in recent years to cater to civil society has led citizens to search for meaning and guidance on the Internet. Following one Israeli online diary as it unfolds on a daily basis, it demonstrates how a young woman, failing to receive from traditional intellectual sources the insights necessary to survive in a terror-stricken environment, steps into the vacuum in search of meaning and guidance, and negotiates her personal, social and political identity online. The article concludes with an evaluation of the blog as a means of public discourse, criticizing its failure to provide for a social dialogue in the real world.


  1. Jenkins, H., Thorburn, D. Barber, B.R. 2003. Which technology and which democracy? pp. 33-48. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Bennett, J.C. 2001. Anglosphere: the new reformation?. United Press InternationalUPI.
  3. Bronson, S. 2004. Web diaries become hot medium for talk in Israel.
  4. Buber, M. 1971. I and thou. New York: Free Press.
  5. Colas, D. 1997. Civil society and fanaticism: conjoined histories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  6. Curling, S. 2003. A closer look at weblogs. LLRX.ComLLRX.Com.
  7. Dahlberg, L. 2001. The Internet and democratic discourse: exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society vol. 4 pp. 615-33.
  8. Evans, A. 2001. This virtual life: escapism and simulation in our media world. London: Fusion.
  9. Habermas, J. 1992. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into the category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  10. Halkin, H. 2004. Politics and the Israeli novel. Commentary vol. 17 pp. 29-37.
  11. Horowitz, D., Lissak, M. 1989. Trouble in Utopia: the overburdened polity of Israel. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  12. Goldfarb, J.C. 1998. Civility and subversion: the intellectual in democratic society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Katz, J.E., Rice, R.E. 2002. Social consequences of Internet use: access, involvement and interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Keren, M. 1989. The pen and the sword: Israeli intellectuals and the making of the nation-state. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  15. Kolko, B.E. 2003. Virtual publics: politics and community in an electronic age. New York: Columbia University Press.
  16. Lila, M. 2001. The reckless mind: intellectuals in politics. New York: NYRB.
  17. Mannheim, K. 1936. Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt.
  18. Morris, B. 2004. Politics by other means. New Republic.
  19. 2004. The Normblog Profile 38: Imshin. Normblog.
  20. Popper, K. 1945. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.
  21. Rainer, T. 1998. Your life as story: discovering the `new autobiography' and writing memoir as literature. New York: Putnam.
  22. Said, E.W. 1994. Representations of the intellectuals. New York: Vintage.
  23. Reif, P. Shils, E. 1970. The intellectuals and the powers: some perspectives for comparative analysis pp. 27-51. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
  24. Sorapure, M. 2003. Screening moments, scrolling lives: diary writing on the web. Biography vol. 26 pp. 1-23.
  25. Traverso, E. 2004. Intellectuals and anti-fascism: for a critical historization. New Politics vol. 9 pp. 91-101.
  26. Beiner, R. Walzer, M. 1995. The civil society argument pp. 153-74. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  27. Wildawsky, A. 1987. Speaking truth to power. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  28. Wolfe, A. 2004. The new pamphleteers. The New York Times.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.