Arch Fam Med
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 4, April 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  •  Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Gender Differences in Coronary Artery Disease

Bias, Method, or Fact of Life?

Joseph Herman, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(4):365-366.

Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.

1. Tobin JN, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Wexler JP, et al. Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:19-25. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Khan SS, Nessim S, Grey R, Czer L, Chaux A, Matloff J. Increased mortality of women in coronary bypass surgery: evidence for referral bias. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:561-567. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:221-225. ABSTRACT
4. Wenger NK. Gender, coronary artery disease and coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:557-558. PUBMED
5. Cowley MJ, Mullin SM, Kelsey SF, et al. Sex differences in early and long-term results of coronary angioplasty in the NHLBI PTCA Registry. Circulation. 1985;71:90-97. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Kennedy JW, Kaiser GC, Fisher LD, et al. Clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS). Circulation. 1981;63:793-802. FREE FULL TEXT
7. Loop FD, Golding LR, MacMillan JP, et al. Coronary artery surgery in women compared with men: analyses of risks and long-term results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:383-390. ABSTRACT
8. Fisher LD, Kennedy JW, Davis KB, et al. Association of sex, physical size, and operative mortality after coronary artery bypass in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;84:334-341. ABSTRACT
9. Case RB, Moss AJ, Case N, McDermott M, Eberly S. Living alone after myocardial infarction: impact on prognosis. JAMA. 1992;267:515-519. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Williams RB, Barefoot JC, Califf RM, et al. Prognostic importance of social and economic resources among medically treated patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. JAMA. 1992;267:520-524. FREE FULL TEXT
11. Ruberman W. Psychosocial influences on mortality of patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1992;267:559-560. FREE FULL TEXT
12. Fiebach NH, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI. Differences between women and men in survival after myocardial infarction: biology or methodology? JAMA. 1990;263:1092-1096. FREE FULL TEXT
13. Greenland P, Reicher-Reiss H, Goldbourt U, Behar S, the Israeli SPRINT Investigators. In-hospital and 1-year mortality in 1,524 women after myocardial infarction: comparison with 4,315 men. Circulation. 1991;83:484-491. FREE FULL TEXT
14. Dittrich H, Gilpin E, Nicod P, Cali G, Henning H, Ross J Jr. Acute myocardial infarction in women: influence of gender on mortality and prognostic variables. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:1-7. PUBMED
15. Schmidt SB, Borsch MA. The prehospital phase of acute myocardial infarction in the era of thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:1411-1415. PUBMED
16. Tyras DH, Barner HB, Kaiser GC, Codd JE, Willman VL. Myocardial revascularization in women. Ann Thorac Surg. 1978;25:449-453. ABSTRACT
17. Krumholz HM, Douglas PS, Lauer MS, Pasternak RC. Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias? Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:785-790. FREE FULL TEXT
18. Bickell NA, Pieper KS, Lee KL, et al. Referral patterns for coronary artery disease treatment: gender bias or good clinical judgment? Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:791-797. PUBMED