Arch Fam Med
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 3, March 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Cervical Cancer Screening

Issues of Collection Tools and Reporting

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(3):261-263.

Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.

1. Crouse BS, Elliott BA, Nesin N. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:145-148. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Melnikow J, Sierk A, Flocke S, Carbonetto C. Does the system of Papanicolaou test nomenclature affect the rate of referral for colposcopy? a survey of family physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1993;3:253-258.
3. Bangle R, Berger M, Levin M. Variation in the morphogenesis of squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. 1963;16:1151-1159. PUBMED
4. Boyd JT, Doll R. A study of the actiology of carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Br J Cancer. 1964;3:419-434.
5. Miller EM, vanHaam E. Symposium: advantages and disadvantages of various techniques of obtaining material for routine cytological examination. Acta Cytol. 1960;4:4236-4237.
6. Nieburgs HE. A comparative study of different techniques for the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956;72:511-515. PUBMED
7. Bichenback W, Soosts HJ. Material obtained by three techniques: (a) vaginal smears, (b) cervical smears and (c) endocervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1960;4:252-256.
8. Shingleton HM, Gore H, Straughn JM, Austin JM, Littleton HJ. The contribution of endocervical smears to cervical cancer detection. Acta Cytol. 1975;19:261-264. PUBMED
9. Elias A, Linthorst G, Bekker B, Vooijs PG. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of epithelial changes. Acta Cytol. 1983;27:225-229. PUBMED
10. Vooijs PG, Elias A, van der Graf Y, Veiling S. Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1985;29:323-328. PUBMED
11. Rylander E. Negative smears in women developing invasive cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56:115-118. PUBMED
12. Kristensen GB, Skyggebjerg KD, Holund B, Holm K, Hansen MK. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Acta Cytol. 1991;35:47-50. PUBMED
13. Klinkhammer P JJM, Vooijs GP, de Haan AFJ. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the quality assessment of cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1989;33:215-218. PUBMED
14. Kwikkel HJ, Quaak MJ, deWith C. Predictive value of the abnormal Pap smear: a retrospective analysis of error rates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1986;21:101-112. PUBMED
15. Kivlahan C, Ingram E. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical smears: are they inadequate? Acta Cytol. 1986;30:258-260. PUBMED
16. Mitchell H, Medley G. Longitudinal study of women with negative cervical smears according to endocervical status. Lancet. 1991;337:265-267. PUBMED
17. National Cancer Institute Workshop. The 1988 Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. JAMA. 1989;262:931-934. FREE FULL TEXT
18. Davey DD, Nielson ML, Rosenstock W, Kline TS. Terminology and specimen adequacy of cervicovaginal cytology: the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:903-907. PUBMED
19. Ayanian JZ, Berwick DM. Do physicians have a bias toward action? a classic study revisited. Med Decis Making. 1991;11:154-158. FREE FULL TEXT
20. Miller AB, Anderson G, Brisson J, et al. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix. Can Med Assoc J. 1991;145:1301-1325. PUBMED
21. Miller AB, Knight J, Narod S. The natural history of cancer of the cervix, and the implications for screening policy. In: Miller AB, Chamberlain J, Day, NE, et al, eds. Cancer Screening. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1991:141-152.
22. National Cancer Institute Workshop. The revised Bethesda system for reporting cervical/ vaginal cytologic diagnoses: report of the 1991 Bethesda workshop. Acta Cytol. 1992;36:273-275. PUBMED