Arch Fam Med
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 3, March 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Does the System of Papanicolaou Test Nomenclature Affect the Rate of Referral for Colposcopy?

A Survey of Family Physicians

Joy Melnikow, MD, MPH; Anne Sierk, MD; Susan Flocke, MA; Claudia A. Peters, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(3):253-258.

Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.

1. Woolf SH. Screening for cervical cancer. In: Goldbloon RB, Lawrence RS, eds. Preventing Disease: Beyond the Rhetoric. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag NY Inc; 1990:319-323.
2. Healthy People 2000. Washington DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1990. DHHS publication PHS 91-50212:430.
3. National Cancer Institute Workshop. The 1988 Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. JAMA. 1989;262:931-934. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Malkasian GD. Cytopathological interpretation and medical consultation. JAMA. 1989;262:942. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Ohrt DK. The intraepithelial lesion: a spectrum of problems. JAMA. 1989;262:944-945. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Herbst AL. The Bethesda system for cervical/ vaginal cytologic diagnoses: a note of caution. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:449-450. PUBMED
7. Kurman RJ, Malkasian Jr GD, Sedlis A, Solomon D. From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: the rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:779-782. PUBMED
8. Vooijis GP, Solomon D, Kraemer BB. Does the Bethesda system promote or endanger the quality of cervical cytology? Acta Cytol. 1990;34:455-459. PUBMED
9. Anderson G. Bethesda system of reporting: a Canadian viewpoint. Diagn Cytopathol. 1991;7:559-561. PUBMED
10. Koss LG. The new Bethesda system for reporting results of smear of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol. 1990;34:616-619.
11. Bottles K, Reiter RC, Steiner AL, Zaleski S, Bedrosian CWM, Johnson SR. Problems encountered with the Bethesda system: the University of Iowa experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:410-414. PUBMED
12. Broder S. Rapid communication—the Bethesda system for reporting cervical/ vaginal cytologic diagnoses: report of the 1991 Bethesda workshop. JAMA. 1992;267:1892. FREE FULL TEXT
13. Maheaux B, Legault C, Lambert J. Increasing response rates in physicians' mail surveys: an experimental study. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:638-639. FREE FULL TEXT
14. Himmelstein LR. Evaluation of inflammatory atypia: a literature review. J Reprod Med. 1989;34:634-637. PUBMED
15. Richart RM. Causes and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer. 1987;60:1951-1959. PUBMED
16. Brown MS, Phillips GL. Management of the mildly abnormal Pap smear: a conservative approach. Gynecol Oncol. 1985;22:149-153. PUBMED
17. Nasiell K, Roger V, Nasiell M. Behavior of mild cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;65:665-669.
18. Singer A, Jenkins D. Viruses and cervical cancer. BMJ. 1991:302:251-252. FREE FULL TEXT
19. Robertson JH, Woodend BE, Crozier EH, Hutchinson J. Risk of cervical cancer associated with mild dyskaryosis. BMJ. 1988;297:18-21. FREE FULL TEXT
20. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Boston, Mass: Duxbury Press; 1986: 335-336.
21. SPSS/PC+ V2.0 Base Manual. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc; 1988.
22. American Medical Association. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the United States. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1990:90.
23. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of 169 Interventions. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1989:25.
24. American College of Physicians. Screening for cervical cancer. In: Eddy M, ed. Common Screening Tests. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1991.
25. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121:1193-1254. PUBMED
26. American Cancer Society. Summary of Current Guidelines for the Cancer-Related Checkup: Recommendations. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 1988.
27. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Professional Standards. Report of task force on routine cancer screening. In: Standards for Obstetric-Gynecologic Services. 7th ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1989:97-104.
28. Jones TV, Gerrity MS, Earp J. Written case simulations: do they predict physicians' behavior? J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:805-815. PUBMED
29. Moskowitz AJ, Kuipers B, Kassier JP. Dealing with uncertainty, risks, and tradeoffs in clinical decisions: a cognitive science approach. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:435-449. FREE FULL TEXT
30. Hartley RM, Charlton JR, Jarman B, Harris CM. Case history questionnaires in the study of doctors' use of resources. Med Care. 1985;23:1163-1170. PUBMED
31. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453-458. FREE FULL TEXT
32. Bryant GD, Norman GR. Expressions of probability: words and numbers. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:411. PUBMED
33. Maquire NC. Current use of the Papanicolaou class system in gynecologic cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 1988;4:169-176. PUBMED
34. Brook RH. Practice guidelines and practicing medicine. JAMA. 1989;262:3027-3030. FREE FULL TEXT
35. Chassin MR. Practice guidelines: best hope for quality improvement in the 1990s. J Occup Med. 1990;32:1199-1206. PUBMED
36. Woolf SH. Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1811-1818. FREE FULL TEXT
37. Clinical guideline development. In: AHCPR program note. Washington, DC: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1990:1-5.
38. Health Services Research Group. Standards, guidelines and clinical policies. Can Med Assoc J. 1992;146:833-837. PUBMED
39. Miller AB, Anderson G, Brisson J, et al. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix. Can Med Assoc J. 1991;145:1301-1325. PUBMED
40. Lomas K, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306-1311. ABSTRACT
41. Kosecoff J, Kanouse DE, Rogers WH, McCloskey L, Winslow CM, Brook RH. Effect of the National Institutes of Health consensus development of physician practice. JAMA. 1987;258:2708-2713. FREE FULL TEXT
42. Hill MN, Levine DM, Whelton PK. Awareness, use and impact of the 1984 Joint National Committee consensus report on high blood pressure. Am J Public Health. 1988;78:1190-1194. FREE FULL TEXT
43. Lomas J. Words without action? the production dissemination and impact of consensus recommendations. Ann Rev Public Health. 1991;12:41-65. PUBMED