The Attitudes of Family Physicians Toward the Peer Review Process
Ronald R. Roth, MD;
Paul J. Porter, EdD;
Gerald R. Bisbey, PhD;
Charles R. May, PhD, EdD
Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(12):1271-1275.
Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.
1. Cardwell MS, Gary JW. Physician peer review: have we gone far enough or too far? Mo Med. 1991;88:221-225.
2. Orlansky A, Pappas D. Survey of D.S.S.N.Y. members' attitudes toward peer review. N Y State Dental J. 1980;23:129-131.
3. Strawcutter HE. Professional review organizations. N C Med J. 1984;45:493-495.
4. Starr P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York, NY: Basic Books Inc; 1982. 5. Murchison GC. The medical community looks at review. Ala J Med Sci. 1985;22:407-409.
6. Mattson MR. Quality assurance: a literature review of a changing field. Hosp Commun Psychiatry. 1984;35:605-616.
FREE FULL TEXT
7. Himler G. Cost versus quality. N Y State J Med. 1979;79:1863-1865.
8. Hudson JD, Ravreby MD. Peer review: indictment, trial and beyond. Iowa Med. 1989;79:580-582.
9. Holthaus D. PROs: peering harder in the 90s. Hospitals. 1989;63:42-46.
10. Goldman RL. The reliability of peer assessment of quality care. JAMA. 1987;267:958-960.
11. Harrop DR. Who reviews the reviewers? Pa Med. 1992;95:34.
12. Aronson MD. Catch-22 in the era of peer review organizations. MD Comput. 1992;9:284-285.
13. Jencks SF, Wilensky GR. The health care quality improvement initiative. JAMA. 1992;268:900.
FREE FULL TEXT