JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 3 No. 8, August 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Cost-benefit Analysis of Walking To Prevent Coronary Heart Disease

Timothy F. Jones, MD; Charles B. Eaton, MD, MS

Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(8):703-710.


Abstract



Objective
To quantify the cost-benefit relationship of walking to prevent coronary heart disease.

Design
Cost-benefit analysis.

Participants
Hypothetical cohorts of sedentary men and women aged 35 to 74 years.

Main Outcome Measures
Decision-analysis simulation was used to evaluate the cost-benefit relationship of walking, varying level of benefit from exercise, frequency of exercise to achieve benefit, participation rates, and costs of exercise and injury.

Results
At a relative risk of 1.9 for heart disease associated with sedentary behavior, $5.6 billion would be saved annually if 10% of adults began a regular walking program. A $4.3 billion savings is predicted if the entire sedentary population began walking regularly and the cost of the time an individual spends exercising is accounted for in those who dislike exercising. According to our baseline assumptions, walking is economically beneficial for men aged 35 to 64 years and for women aged 55 to 64 years. The threshold of relative risk at which economic benefit is found for walking in this population overall is estimated at 1.7, and under a volunteer model, most adults would benefit even at a relative risk of 1.15.

Conclusions
There are significant sex and age differences in the economic benefits of walking to prevent heart disease. The value assigned to the time an individual spends exercising has a significant impact on the results. Overall, a substantial savings is predicted from encouraging sedentary individuals to participate in a regular walking program.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Family Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine/Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of walking on life expectancy and lifetime medical expenditure: the Ohsaki Cohort Study
Nagai et al.
BMJ Open 2011;1:bmjopen-2011-000240-bmjopen-2011-000240.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Statewide Media Campaign to Promote Adolescent Physical Activity
Peterson et al.
Health Promot Pract 2008;9:426-433.
ABSTRACT  

Review Article: Cost-effectiveness of healthcare-based interventions aimed at improving physical activity
Hagberg and Lindholm
Scand J Public Health 2006;34:641-653.
ABSTRACT  

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Physical Activity Using Bike/Pedestrian Trails
Wang et al.
Health Promot Pract 2005;6:174-179.
ABSTRACT  

Health-Care Costs and Exercise Capacity
Weiss et al.
Chest 2004;126:608-613.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of walking upon medical care expenditure in Japan: the Ohsaki Cohort Study
Tsuji et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:809-814.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

References
Circulation 2002;106:3373-3421.
FULL TEXT  

Task Force #2--the cost of prevention: can we afford it? Can we afford not to do it?
Krumholz et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:603-615.
FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG