JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 3 No. 7, July 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Computer-Based vs Manual Health Maintenance Tracking

A Controlled Trial

Paul S. Frame, MD; James G. Zimmer, MD; Paula L. Werth, MPS; W. Jackson Hall, PhD; Shirley W. Eberly, MS

Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(7):581-588.


Abstract



Objective
To compare computer-based with manual health maintenance tracking systems to determine whether (1) a computer-based system will result in better provider compliance with the practice health maintenance protocol, (2) the incremental cost of operating a computer-based vs a manual health maintenance tracking system differs, and (3) inactive patients will respond to health maintenance reminders.

Design
Two-year prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting
Rural, multiple-office, nonprofit, fee-forservice family practice.

Patients
Adult members of families in which at least one member had been seen by the practice within the past 2 years.

Intervention
A computer-based health maintenance tracking system that generated annual provider and patient reminders for all patients regardless of appointment status compared with a manual flowchart-based tracking system in which patient reminders were triggered by provider request.

Outcome Measures
Provider compliance with the health maintenance protocol determined by preinter-vention and postintervention chart audits, costs of computer-based tracking, and response of inactive patients to health maintenance reminders.

Results
Overall provider compliance with the health maintenance protocol increased 15 percentage points in the computer-based tracking group and four percentage points in the manual group. The computer-based tracking group had significantly higher provider compliance than the manual group for eight of 11 procedures. The computer-based tracking system cost 78 cents per patient per year to operate. It was not associated with increased office visits or patient billings.

Conclusions
Computer-based health maintenance tracking improved provider health maintenance compliance compared with a manual system. The finding that health maintenance compliance improved without a significant increase in patient visits or billings requires confirmation in other settings but suggests that considerable health maintenance can be incorporated into ongoing patient care.



Author Affiliations



From Tri-County Family Medicine, Dansville, NY (Dr Frame and Ms Werth), and the Departments of Family Medicine (Dr Frame), Community and Preventive Medicine (Drs Frame and Zimmer), and Biostatistics (Dr Hall and Ms Eberly), University of Rochester (NY) School of Medicine and Dentistry.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Development of a Highly Constrained Health Level 7 Implementation Guide to Facilitate Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Systems
Sujansky et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:285-290.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computer-Based Documentation: Effects on Parent-Provider Communication During Pediatric Health Maintenance Encounters
Johnson et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:590-598.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prompting Clinicians about Preventive Care Measures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Dexheimer et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:311-320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Garg et al.
JAMA 2005;293:1223-1238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computer-Based Documentation: Effect on Parent and Physician Satisfaction During a Pediatric Health Maintenance Encounter
Johnson et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:250-254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening Among Attendees of Community Health Centers
Roetzheim et al.
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:294-300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Providers' Reactions to an Automated Health Maintenance Reminder System Incorporated into the Patient's Electronic Medical Record
Schellhase et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2003;16:312-317.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Automated Health Maintenance Reminders: Tools Do Not Make a System
Frame
J Am Board Fam Med 2003;16:350-351.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Benefit Analysis of a New HEDIS Performance Measure for Pneumococcal Vaccination
Ahmed et al.
Med Decis Making 2002;22:S58-S66.
ABSTRACT  

Three Decades of Research on Computer Applications in Health Care: Medical Informatics Support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Michael Fitzmaurice et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9:144-160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care
Lemelin et al.
CMAJ 2001;164:757-763.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Patient Reminder/Recall Interventions on Immunization Rates: A Review
Szilagyi et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1820-1827.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of the Effects of Computer and Manual Reminders on Compliance with a Mental Health Clinical Practice Guideline
Cannon and Allen
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:196-203.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Preventive Care by Prompting Physicians
Balas et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:301-308.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

After the Grant Runs Out: Long-term Provider Health Maintenance Compliance Using a Computer-Based Tracking System
Cooley et al.
Arch Fam Med 1999;8:13-17.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Hunt et al.
JAMA 1998;280:1339-1346.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer Early-Detection Services in Community Health Centers for the Underserved: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Dietrich et al.
Arch Fam Med 1998;7:320-327.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician and Patient Predictors of Health Maintenance Visits
Preisser et al.
Arch Fam Med 1998;7:346-351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computerized decision support systems: an overview
Hajioff
Health Informatics Journal 1998;4:23-28.
ABSTRACT  

An Industrial Process View of Information Delivery to Support Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Systems Design and Process Measures
Elson et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:266-278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Volunteer Facilitators Assist Community Practices With Enhancing Cancer Control
Woodruff et al.
Arch Fam Med 1996;5:560-565.
ABSTRACT  

Computerized Patient Records in Primary Care: Their Role in Mediating Guideline-Driven Physician Behavior Change
Elson and Connelly
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:698-705.
ABSTRACT  

Estimating Cancer Screening Indicators in the Primary Care Setting
Neale et al.
Eval Health Prof 1995;18:187-201.
ABSTRACT  

Differences in the Frequency of Cholesterol Screening in Patients With Medicaid Compared With Private Insurance
Hueston et al.
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:331-334.
ABSTRACT  

COMPUTER HEALTH-MAINTENANCE TRACKING BOOSTS COMPLIANCE
JWatch General 1994;1994:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

Computer-Assisted Preventive Care: Time to 'Byte' the Bullet?
McPhee
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:576-578.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG